Citation

Barrenger SL, Kriegel L, Canada KE, Blank Wilson A. Crim. Justice Behav. 2021; 48(3): 259-273.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0093854820983844

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Research on reentry for individuals with mental illnesses leaving jails and prisons lacks outcome specificity and standardization needed to advance knowledge about the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions. This scoping review aims to provide clarity about reentry outcomes by: (a) ascertaining what outcomes are a focus in reentry research, (b) explicating how outcomes are defined, and (c) identifying commonalities or gaps in outcomes reported. A search of multiple databases yielded 415 articles for potential inclusion. After independent document review by two of the authors, 61 articles were included in the review. Recidivism was the most used construct, accounting for 58% of total outcomes and 95% of criminal legal outcomes. Behavioral health indicators were reported the second most frequently and other outcomes were rarely reported. Increasing the specificity of commonly used concepts while also expanding the breadth of outcomes considered is needed to build an evidence base this area of research.

Language: en

Keywords

jail reentry; mental illnesses; prison reentry; recidivism; scoping review