Citation

Lee JF, Brown SR, Lange AP, Brothers RM. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2013; 27(12): 3402-3411.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, National Strength and Conditioning Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Nonvented "aerodynamic helmets" reduce wind resistance but may increase head (T-h) and gastrointestinal (T-o) temperature and reduce performance when worn in hot conditions. This study tested the hypothesis that Th and To would be greater during low-intensity cycling (LIC) in the heat while wearing an aero helmet (AERO) vs. a traditional vented racing helmet (REG). This study also tested the hypothesis that Th, To, and finish time would be greater, and power output would be reduced during a self-paced time trial in the heat with AERO vs. REG. Ten highly trained heat-acclimated endurance athletes conducted LIC (50% Vo(2)max, LIC) and a high-intensity 12-km self-paced time trial (12-km TT) on a cycle ergometer in 39 degrees C on 2 different days (AERO and REG), separated by >48 hours. During LIC, Th was higher at minute 7.5 and all time points thereafter in AERO vs. REG (p < 0.05). Similarly, during the 12-km TT, Th was higher at minutes 12.5, 15, and 17.5 in AERO vs. REG (p < 0.05). Heart rate (HR) and To increased during LIC and during 12-km TT (both p < 0.001); however, no significant interaction (helmet x time) existed for HR or To at either intensity (all p> 0.05). No group differences existed for finish time or power output during the 12-km TT (both p > 0.05). In conclusion, Th becomes elevated during cycling in the heat with an aero helmet compared with a traditional vented racing helmet during LIC and high-intensity cycling, yet To and HR responses are similar irrespective of helmet type and Th. Furthermore, the higher Th that develops when an aero helmet is worn during cycling in the heat does not affect power output or cycling performance during shortduration high-intensity events.

Language: en