Citation

Grifoni D, Messeri A, Crisci A, Bonafede M, Pasi F, Gozzini B, Orlandini S, Marinaccio A, Mari R, Morabito M, Group OBOTWC. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021; 18(18): e9940.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

DOI

10.3390/ijerph18189940

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Outdoor workers are particularly exposed to climate conditions, and in particular, the increase of environmental temperature directly affects their health and productivity. For these reasons, in recent years, heat-health warning systems have been developed for workers generally using heat stress indicators obtained by the combination of meteorological parameters to describe the thermal stress induced by the outdoor environment on the human body. There are several studies on the verification of the parameters predicted by meteorological models, but very few relating to the validation of heat stress indicators. This study aims to verify the performance of two limited area models, with different spatial resolution, potentially applicable in the occupational heat health warning system developed within the WORKLIMATE project for the Italian territory. A comparison between the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature predicted by the models and that obtained by data from 28 weather stations was carried out over about three summer seasons in different daily time slots, using the most common skill of performance. The two meteorological models were overall comparable for much of the Italian explored territory, while major limits have emerged in areas with complex topography. This study demonstrated the applicability of limited area models in occupational heat health warning systems.

Language: en

Keywords

climate change; high-resolution forecasts; limited area model (LAM); meteorological model performance; occupational health and safety; personalized forecasts for workers; wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT)