SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Ashigbi EYK, Giesche F, Groneberg DA, Banzer W, Niederer D. Phys. Ther. Sport 2021; 52: 194-203.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.09.010

PMID

34597865

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate acute effects of a single bout of football specific neuromuscular injury preventive warm-up on potential anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-injury risk factors during anticipated and unanticipated jump-landings.

DESIGN: Crossover.

METHODS: Fourteen participants (mean ± SD age, 23.4 ± 4.1 years) 6-24 months after ACL reconstruction performed the Prevent Injury and Enhance Performance (PEP) and bicycle ergometer warm-up in a randomised sequence. Washout phase was one week. Countermovement jumps with anticipated and unanticipated single-leg-landings were assessed. Decision-making quality was measured using landing error count.

RESULTS: No carry-over effects occurred (p > 0.05). The unanticipated task produced significantly higher peak ground reaction forces (Δ+4%, F((11)) = 3.46, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.21) after PEP warm-up compared to ergometer warm-up. A lower number of decision (Δ+12%, F ((5)) = 17.1, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.57) and cumulated (Δ+15%, F ((3)) = 17.2, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.57) errors were recorded during the unanticipated condition following PEP compared to ergometer warm-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating unanticipated jump-landing ability prior to return to sports clearance may provide information on potential re-injury risk factors. PEP warm-up may be superior to bicycle ergometer warm-up at improving unanticipated decision-making quality among athletes cleared to return to sports.


Language: en

Keywords

Injury prevention; Anticipation; Decision-making; Landing-safety

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print