Citation

Corrales MA, Cronin DS. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021; 9: e681134.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Frontiers Media)

DOI

10.3389/fbioe.2021.681134

PMID

34621726

PMCID

PMC8490732

Abstract

The increased incidence of injury demonstrated in epidemiological data for the elderly population, and females compared to males, has not been fully understood in the context of the biomechanical response to impact. A contributing factor to these differences in injury risk could be the variation in geometry between young and aged persons and between males and females. In this study, a new methodology, coupling a CAD and a repositioning software, was developed to reposture an existing Finite element neck while retaining a high level of mesh quality. A 5th percentile female aged neck model (F05(75YO)) and a 50th percentile male aged neck model (M50(75YO)) were developed from existing young (F05(26YO) and M50(26YO)) neck models (Global Human Body Models Consortium v5.1). The aged neck models included an increased cervical lordosis and an increase in the facet joint angles, as reported in the literature. The young and the aged models were simulated in frontal (2, 8, and 15 g) and rear (3, 7, and 10 g) impacts. The responses were compared using head and relative facet joint kinematics, and nominal intervertebral disc shear strain. In general, the aged models predicted higher tissue deformations, although the head kinematics were similar for all models. In the frontal impact, only the M50(75YO) model predicted hard tissue failure, attributed to the combined effect of the more anteriorly located head with age, when compared to the M50(26YO), and greater neck length relative to the female models. In the rear impacts, the F05(75YO) model predicted higher relative facet joint shear compared to the F05(26YO), and higher relative facet joint rotation and nominal intervertebral disc strain compared to the M50(75YO). When comparing the male models, the relative facet joint kinematics predicted by the M50(26YO) and M50(75YO) were similar. The contrast in response between the male and female models in the rear impacts was attributed to the higher lordosis and facet angle in females compared to males. Epidemiological data reported that females were more likely to sustain Whiplash Associated Disorders in rear impacts compared to males, and that injury risk increases with age, in agreement with the findings in the present study. This study demonstrated that, although the increased lordosis and facet angle did not affect the head kinematics, changes at the tissue level were considerable (e.g., 26% higher relative facet shear in the female neck compared to the male, for rear impact) and relatable to the epidemiology. Future work will investigate tissue damage and failure through the incorporation of aged material properties and muscle activation.

Language: en

Keywords

age effects; finite element model; frontal impact; neck biomechanical response; rear impact; sex effects; size effects; stature effects