SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Cai Z, Junus A, Chang Q, Yip PSF. J. Affect. Disord. 2021; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.054

PMID

34953923

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of suicide methods largely determines the outcome of suicide acts. However, no existing meta-analysis has assessed the case fatality rates (CFRs) by different suicide methods. The current study aimed to fill this gap.

METHODS: We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest and Embase for studies reporting method-specific CFRs in suicide, published from inception to 31 December, 2020. A random-effect model meta-analysis was applied to compute pooled estimates.

RESULTS: Of 10708 studies screened, 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the suicide acts that resulted in death or hospitalization respectively, firearms were found to be the most lethal method (CFR:89.7%), followed by hanging/suffocation (84.5%), drowning (80.4%), gas poisoning (56.6%), jumping (46.7%), drug/liquid poisoning (8.0%) and cutting (4.0%). The rank of the lethality for different methods remained relatively stable across study setting, sex and age group.

METHOD-specific CFRs for males and females were similar for most suicide methods, while method-CFRs were specifically higher in older adults.

CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first meta-analysis to provide significant evidence for the wide variation of lethality of suicide methods. Restricting highly lethal methods based on local context is vital in suicide prevention.


Language: en

Keywords

Suicide; Methods; Suicide prevention; Case fatality; Lethality

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print