SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kiviniemi MT, Orom H, Hay JL, Waters EA. BMC Public Health 2022; 22(1): e298.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s12889-022-12649-4

PMID

35164719

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many US politicians have provided mixed messages about the risks posed by SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and whether and to what extent prevention practices should be put in place to prevent transmission. This politicization of the virus and pandemic may affect individuals' risk perceptions and willingness to take precautions. We examined how political party affiliation relates to risk perception for one's own and other people's likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 illness.

METHODS: We surveyed members of a nationally-representative, probability-sampling based survey panel (Nā€‰=ā€‰410) to examine their risk perceptions, precautionary behaviors, and political party affiliation.

RESULTS: The more strongly one identified as a Republican, the less risk one perceived to oneself from SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and the less risk one perceived other people faced. Moreover, those identifying as more strongly Republican engaged in fewer preventive behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS: This differential response may affect virus transmission patterns and poses a considerable challenge for health communications efforts.


Language: en

Keywords

*SARS-CoV-2; *COVID-19; *Political affiliation; *Preventive behaviors; *Risk perception

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print