SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Vaucel JA, Enaud N, Paradis C, Bragança C, Courtois A, Lan M, Gil-Jardiné C, Enaud R, Labadie M, Deguigne M, Roux GL, Descatha A, Azzouz R, Nisse P, Patat AM, Paret N, Blanc-Brisset I, Nardon A, Haro L, Simon N, Delcourt N, Pelissier F, Tournoud C, Puskarczyk E, Langrand J, Laborde-Casterot H, Caré W, Vodovar D. Clin. Toxicol. (Phila) 2022; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15563650.2022.2051537

PMID

35311427

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the number of patients managed by poison control centres (PCCs) has increased without a proportional increase in the number of physicians. To improve efficiency without neglecting patient follow-up, some PCCs have begun using text messages. We evaluated the difference in response rates between text messaging and traditional telephone follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric, non-randomised cohort study was conducted using data from calls made by the New Aquitaine PCC between February 27, 2019, and March 31, 2019. Patients were contacted up to three times by a phone call or short message service (SMS).

RESULTS: For the analysis, 823 patients were included. At the end of follow-up, the response rates were similar in the phone call and SMS group (94 vs. 94%; p = 0.76) with median [interquartile range] response times of 0 min [0; 27 min] and 29 min [6; 120 min], respectively. The response rates did not differ in subgroups stratified according to sex, self-poisoning vs. relative response, age class, and solicitation during working hours vs. outside of working hours (all p > 0.5). Moreover, health practitioners required 2.4-fold more time to call than to send text messages (p < 0.001), and all practitioners were satisfied or very satisfied with text messaging implementation.

CONCLUSION: Patients had good adherence to text messages. Text messages are easy to use, rapid, and allow the physician to easily prioritise follow-up without occupying the emergency line. Additionally, the costs of installation and maintenance are low for text message systems; these low costs facilitate the implementation of such services in various medical situations.


Language: en

Keywords

public health; health information exchange; Poison control centers; telemedicine; text messaging

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print