SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hambali A, Kasim MS, Husshini NHN, Nasiruddin SM, Nawi MAM, Rosidah J, Mohamed SB, Ito T. Int. J. Nanoelectron. Mater. 2022; 15: 281-298.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Universiti Malaysia Perlis)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

One of the main parts of the automotive bumper system is the bumper beam. A bumper beam is a safety feature of a car where it functions to absorb impact energy during a collision. It is important to improve the bumper beam design to improve vehicle safety. The objective of the paper is to investigate the most suitable bumper beam cross-section at the conceptual design stage using finite element analysis (FEA). There are five (5) conceptual designs with different types of cross-sections that have been proposed to evaluate its energy absorption analysis through ANSYS LS DYNA software. The indicators considered in evaluating and determining the best design are energy absorption, specific energy absorption (SEA) and deformation of the bumper beam after crashed. For the selection process, six bumper beam structures have been considered. Analytical hierarchy process and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP-TOPSIS) method was employed to determine the best design through identified product design specification (PDS) of frontal low-speed impact low carbon steel bumper beam. Through the seven elements identified in product design specification (PDS) using the AHP-TOPSIS method, conceptual design 4 (CD-4) bumper beam was the best bumper beam design with a Relative closeness coefficient (Ci) value of 0.564.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print