|
Abstract
|
PURPOSE Official criminal justice statistics (e.g. arrest rates) underestimate the frequency of crime because not all crime gets reported to authorities, a phenomenon known as the "dark figure of crime." The present study aims to examine the dark figure of violence committed by discharged psychiatric patients.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Multiple reporting modalities permitted a direct comparison between patients whose violence was officially detected to those whose violence was self-reported but not officially detected, along with differences in the nature of violent acts.
FINDINGS Only 5% of violent individuals were officially detected, 26% of violent individuals were both officially detected and self-reported their violent behavior, while 68% of violent individuals self-reported their violent behavior and were not officially detected. The type of violent acts did not vary as a function of whether they were officially detected or self-reported. However, differences were observed for the location of violence, the relationship to the victim and whether an injury resulted. Older individuals, those with prior arrests and those with higher psychopathy scores are some of the factors associated with an increased likelihood of officially detected violence. Research limitations/implications The data were collected from three sites in the USA. Generalizing the specific findings to other locations and countries ought to be done cautiously. Practical implications Studies ought to include multiple methods to measure violence. Self-report seems to be especially important to the extent one is concerned with measuring actual violence rather than violence that gets detected by legal authorities.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE This study highlights an important limitation of relying exclusively on official criminal justice statistics when studying violence or recidivism in the community.
Language: en |