Citation

Raj M, Wiltermuth SS. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2022; 168: e104110.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.104110

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Victims of many types of transgressions may delay voicing accusations of wrongdoing. Across seven studies and a within-paper meta-analysis, we examine whether these victims pay a social cost and, if so, how they can reduce it. We find that people perceive victims who delay (vs. do not delay) voicing accusations to have less psychological standing to accuse their transgressors. People therefore perceive such victims as lacking in integrity-based trustworthiness and, often, in benevolence-based trustworthiness as well. People consequently report greater intentions to avoid such victims, trust them less in an economic game with money at stake, and are less willing to hire them. The findings collectively highlight the difficulty that victims face in moving from silence to voice. We further draw on the triangle model of excuses (e.g., Schlenker, 1997) to identify attributions that attenuate the social cost of victims' delayed accusations.

Language: en