SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yesberg JA, Bradford B, Dawson P. J. Exp. Criminol. 2021; 17(1): 1-13.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s11292-019-09408-8

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study tested whether the presence of a firearm changed the way people reacted to police among a British sample.

Method

In an online study, participants were shown images of armed and unarmed police and rated them on a number of variables. Some participants were primed to think about terrorism, and some participants were exposed to more armed police than others.

Results

Participants had more negative responses to police when they were armed. We found no effect of the terrorism prime on people's reactions to images of armed police and no effect of exposure. Yet, unexpectedly, we found a negative effect of the terrorism prime on trust and legitimacy.

Conclusions

In a country where police have never before been routinely armed, this research raises important questions about how armed police can retain the public's support when they may no longer be considered 'prototypical representatives' of the British people.


Language: en

Keywords

Armed police; British policing; Firearms; Perceptions of police; Social identity; Terrorism salience

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print