SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Cloutier MS, Brodeur-Ouimet P, Lamarche AA, Pierre-Maxime L. J. Transp. Health 2022; 25(Suppl): e101438.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jth.2022.101438

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among Montreal's 13 pedestrian street summer projects in 2021, two locations (Avenue du Mont-Royal and Rue Wellington) have set up a pilot project considering the cohabitation between pedestrians and cyclists by authorizing cyclists to stay on their bike at a slow pace while it's forbidden on other pedestrian streets. Our objective is to evaluate safety issues related to this cohabitation in a specific context: the pedestrian street.

Methods: Our method is based on non-participatory field observation of the cyclists when they were moving along specific street segments (n=4). Previously trained observers collected data (on IPads) on cyclists (age, gender, type of vehicle), their actions (adequate speed, going straight, stopping, etc.) and interactions with pedestrians. Data collection was carried out in blocks of 3 hours, twice per selected segment in July and August 2021.

Results: A total of 1371 cyclists were observed. Cyclists' behaviours, measured with a pre-determined list of actions they could do as they were cycling, did not change much along the stretch: the majority of them rode straight as prescribed (66%) and a small proportion only were zig zagging or changed direction (10%). Similarly, a very small minority were considered to cycle "dangerously" (6%), even if this proportion was higher (24%) for users of a wheel-vehicle other than a bicycle (e.g., motorized mobility aid, scooter, etc.). As for the interactions between cyclists and pedestrians, they represent 30% of all their actions while in more than half of these interactions, the cyclist avoided the pedestrian ahead of the potential collision point, a similar proportion in all observation sites.

Conclusions: Our unique observation dataset shows that the coexistence of pedestrians and cyclists on pedestrian streets generally poses few risks to the safety of users. The success of this pilot project in Montreal could lead to more widespread cohabitation between pedestrians and cyclists on the vast network of pedestrian streets.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print