Citation

Jakicic V, Boyer L, Francis G. Int. J. Aerosp. Psychol. 2022; 32(4): 203-226.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/24721840.2022.2084096

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We investigated the role of Perrone's algorithm in the Black Hole Illusion (BHI). After analyzing the algorithm and identifying two of its predictions, we empirically tested them with two on-line experiments.Background In 1983, Perrone proved that in daylight conditions it is possible to compute the descent angle using a ratio of retinal distances corresponding to the runway and surrounding context. Using the algorithm in nighttime conditions, with just the visible runway, pilots would overestimate the descent angle, leading to the BHI.

METHOD Mathematical analysis indicates the algorithm predicts a large BHI; perhaps too large if there are no mitigating factors. As Perrone noted, the BHI illusion magnitude should be affected by runway width; we also found that some conditions predict a reverse BHI (pilots should underestimate their descent angle). In our experiments, participants observed a cockpit view of a runway during five seconds of steady approach. In a subsequent still image, participants indicated where they believed the plane would land if it continued its flight path. We measured the accuracy of the landing positions for various runway widths and various background contexts.

RESULTS The experiments did not show a BHI for any conditions; so the experiments do not validate the model predictions.

CONCLUSION Based on our analyses, Perrone's algorithm does not provide an adequate explanation of the Black Hole Illusion.

Language: en