SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gabel C. Inj. Prev. 2022; 28(Suppl 2): A16.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/injuryprev-2022-safety2022.49

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion (Safety 2022)

[SafetyLit note: Slacklining refers to the act of walking, running or balancing along a suspended length of flat webbing that is tensioned between two anchors. Slacklining is similar to slack rope walking and tightrope walking. Slacklines differ from tightwires and tightropes in the type of material used and the amount of tension applied during use.]

Background Slacklining academic research span less than 15 years. An in-depth scoping review would improve evidence for or against slacklining in falls prevention and identify the concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps.

Methods A scoping review used internet Search-engines and databases for any publications from inception till January 2022, including grey-literature by hand-search or expanded through scientific/social-networking sites. Data selection used a modified Arksey and O'Malley framework. Inclusion criteria were key search-terms associated with 'slacklin* or slackl-lin* that referenced human falls and injury prevention in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese, and French. Further reduction used 'Not' elimination, then independent extraction based on title/abstract by two reviewers, discrepancies ratified by a third. All articles were mapped falls relevant for subject-grouping.

Results From 7158 articles 29 were identified, five grey-literature; 12 RCTs PEDro scored average=5.7. Evidence included: Level-I=six systematic reviews (three slackline-specific, three included slacklining); Level-II=11 (RCTs); Level-III=1 (CCT); Level-IV=4 (cohort-studies); Level-V=0 (qualitative-studies); Level-VI=4 (descriptive-studies/case-studies); Level-VII=3 (opinion-articles). Neurological patients=6.
Conclusions Slackline research has progressed significantly in the decade of publication. However, investigations of effectiveness for falls management and prevention, particularly with symptomatic patients remains deficient with most symptomatic research being Level I and II in neurological patients then falls and sports-injury prevention.

Learning Outcomes slacklining has a strong role in falls prevention and rehabilitation as a highly adaptable balance challenge task that is self-motivating and self-directed for musculoskeletal, neurological and sporting subjects from children to seniors and elite athletes.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print