SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Zhang L, Yu J, Wang H, Li S, Liu K, Xia Y, Liao Z, Li S, Yan J. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2022; 34(10): 1076-1081.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi)

DOI

10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220907-00826

PMID

36473567

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the establishment of the interconvertible injury parameters of same severe blast injury in mice at plain and plateau.

METHODS: A total of 157 C57BL/6 male mice were randomly divided into plain control group (8 mice), plain injury group (77 mice), plateau control group (8 mice) and plateau injury group (64 mice) according to random number table method. The mice in plateau control group and plateau blast injury group had been placed in animal experimental low-pressure oxygen chamber to simulate 4 000 meters plateau environment for 5 days in advance. Then the mice in plain blast injury group and plateau blast injury group were put into biological shock tube, respectively. Different pressures of the driving section were selected to establish the severe blast injury models in mice at plain and 4 000 meters plateau to reach approximately 70% mortality within 72 hours. The equivalent traumatic condition at 24 hours after blast injury in different groups was verified by the series of experiments including gross autopsy, lung wet/dry weight ratio (W/D), hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and histological scoring.

RESULTS: The mice mortality were basically consistent between the plain injury group (65%) and plateau injury group (75%) when 5.4 MPa and 4.0 MPa of the driving section pressures were chosen, respectively. Compared with the corresponding control groups, the lungs showed massive hemorrhage (patchy and diffuse) with significant pulmonary edema in both plain 5.4 MPa-injured group and the plateau 4.0 MPa-injured group at 24 hours after blast injury. Compared with the plateau control group, the pulmonary W/D ratio were significantly increased in the plateau injury group (5.579±0.646 vs. 4.476±0.076, P < 0.05), while the difference between plateau injury group and the plain control group was not statistically significant (5.303±1.020 vs. 4.015±0.144, P > 0.05). Also, compared with the corresponding control groups, the analysis of lung histopathological sections showed that there were several pathological changes including large alveolar rupture and fusion, thickened alveolar walls, and a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration in the alveolar lumen in the groups of plain 5.4 MPa and plateau 4.0 MPa. In addition, the histopathological scores of lung in the groups of plain 5.4 MPa and plateau 4.0 MPa were significantly higher than that in corresponding control group (8.67±0.82 vs. 1.67±0.52, 9.00±1.10 vs. 2.17±0.41, both P < 0.05), however, there was no statistical difference for the above score between plain blast injury group and plateau blast injury group.

CONCLUSIONS: The pressures of driving section 5.4 MPa and 4.0 MPa are injury parameters to establish equivalent severe blast injury in mice at plain and plateau, respectively, which can be converted to each other. This study provides support for the application and evaluation of prevention and treatment technology for severe blast injury in special environment.


Language: zh

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print