SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Barbier A, Chariot P, Lefèvre T. Front. Public Health 2022; 10: e1033465.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Frontiers Editorial Office)

DOI

10.3389/fpubh.2022.1033465

PMID

36530735

PMCID

PMC9755339

Abstract

STUDY QUESTIONS: To describe the prevalence of physical, sexual, and psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) against women in the European Union (EU) and to search for their determinants among demographic, socioeconomic, health-related factors, and partner characteristics.

METHODS: Observational study. Data from the violence against women survey, the first study conducted in the EU, which simultaneously measured all dimensions of IPV and many characteristics. The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights randomly conducted face-to-face interviews among the 28 countries with 42,002 women aged 18-74 who resided in the survey country and spoke the language. IPV is defined by a positive answer to at least one question about physical, sexual, or psychological violence perpetrated by a current or ex-partner.

FINDINGS: Among the 40,357 women having already been in a relationship, 51.7% (51.2-52.2) reported having been victims of violence in their lifetime. The prevalence of physical, sexual, and psychological IPV was, respectively, 20.0% (19.6-20.4), 8.4% (8.2-8.7), and 48.5% (48.1-49.0). Women, who were younger, employed, had highly qualified work, had at least one immigrant parent, lived in an urban setting, were unmarried, separated, divorced, widowed, childless, cohabited with a partner, and others over the age of 18, had worse self-perceived health, or a history of violence before the age of 15 were more likely to report IPV. It was the same when their partners had a lower level of education, no work, were home staying, earned less than they did, were involved in 10 years of relationship, were frequently drunk, or were violent otherwise. MAJOR IMPLICATION: The lifetime prevalence of reported IPV among women in Europe is high and likely underestimated. The results emphasize the importance of a comprehensive definition of IPV and partners' characteristics. They highlight socioeconomic differences and poorer health status for victims of IPV.


Language: en

Keywords

Adult; European Union; Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Europe; Prevalence; prevalence; intimate partner violence; associated factors; *Intimate Partner Violence/psychology; Europe/epidemiology; ever-partnered women; partner; Violence/psychology

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print