SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hidaka T, Tsuruta M, Hasegawa H. Trans. Soc. Automot. Eng. Jpn. 2022; 53(6): 1146-1153.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan)

DOI

10.11351/jsaeronbun.53.1146

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study was conducted to select appropriate evaluation words for sound quality evaluation of car audio systems and to clarify the required sound quality. From the 997 adjectives prepared, 104 were selected as appropriate evaluation words through an Internet survey. Next, a listening experiment was conducted to select words with no overlap in meaning, and the evaluation results were classified by cluster analysis and refined by graphical modeling. As a result, 11 evaluation words were selected, including a preference word. Then, the results of causal analysis using covariance structure analysis showed that 'Ear friendly' had the greatest influence on the evaluation word 'Like,' followed by 'Natural' and 'Sense of spread.' This indicates that the sound quality of car audio desired by many people is 'a natural sound with little stimulation.'


Language: ja

Keywords

and control; audio; communication; covariance structure analysis; evaluation word; graphical modeling; information

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print