Citation

Delgadillo J, Budimir S, Barkham M, Humer E, Pieh C, Probst T. Front. Public Health 2023; 11: e1010264.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Frontiers Editorial Office)

DOI

10.3389/fpubh.2023.1010264

PMID

36935710

PMCID

PMC10014716

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate and model the interactions between a range of risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation using general population data collected during the critical phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS: Bayesian network analyses were applied to cross-sectional data collected 1 month after the COVID-19 lockdown measures were implemented in Austria and the United Kingdom. In nationally representative samples (n = 1,005 Austria; n = 1,006 UK), sociodemographic features and a multi-domain battery of health, wellbeing and quality of life (QOL) measures were completed. Predictive accuracy was examined using the area under the curve (AUC) within-sample (country) and out-of-sample.

RESULTS: The AUC of the Bayesian network models were ≥ 0.84 within-sample and ≥0.79 out-of-sample, explaining close to 50% of variability in suicidal ideation. In total, 15 interrelated risk and protective factors were identified. Seven of these factors were replicated in both countries: depressive symptoms, loneliness, anxiety symptoms, self-efficacy, resilience, QOL physical health, and QOL living environment.

CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian network models had high predictive accuracy. Several psychosocial risk and protective factors have complex interrelationships that influence suicidal ideation. It is possible to predict suicidal risk with high accuracy using this information.

Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; risk factors; suicide; COVID-19; depression; *Suicidal Ideation; Pandemics; *COVID-19/epidemiology; Quality of Life; Bayes Theorem; Protective Factors; Bayesian network analysis; Communicable Disease Control