|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVES: Military personnel are exposed to multiple risk factors for hearing loss, particularly on the battlefield. The objective of this study was to determine whether pre-existing hearing loss predicted hearing threshold shift in male U.S. military personnel following injury during combat deployment.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study with 1573 male military personnel physically injured in Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom between 2004 and 2012. Audiograms before and after injury were analyzed and used to calculate significant threshold shift (STS), defined as a 30 dB or greater change in the sum of hearing thresholds at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz in either ear on the postinjury audiogram, relative to the same frequencies on the preinjury audiogram.
RESULTS: Twenty-five percent (n = 388) of the sample had preinjury hearing loss, which mostly occurred in the higher frequencies (i.e., 4000 and 6000 Hz). The prevalence of postinjury STS ranged from 11.7% to 33.3% as preinjury hearing level moved from better to worse. In multivariable logistic regression, preinjury hearing loss was a predictor of STS, and there was a dose-response relationship between severity of preinjury hearing threshold and postinjury STS, specifically for preinjury hearing levels of 40 to 45 dBHL (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 3.88), 50 to 55 dBHL (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.64), and >55 dBHL (OR = 3.77; 95% CI = 2.25 to 6.34).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that better preinjury hearing provides increased resistance to threshold shift than impaired preinjury hearing. Although STS is calculated using 2000 to 4000 Hz, clinicians must closely attend to the pure-tone response at 6000 Hz and use this test frequency to identify service members at-risk for STS prior to combat deployment.
Language: en |