Citation

Wu Q, Chi P, Zhang Y. Int. J. Public Health 2023; 68: e1605552.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.3389/ijph.2023.1605552

PMID

37497123

PMCID

PMC10366363

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As a stressor in the context of COVID-19 pandemic fatigue is associated with well-being. However, how pandemic fatigue is associated with well-being and what protective factors buffer this negative effect are under investigated. Based on the stress process model and emotion regulation theory, the study examined the indirect effect of pandemic fatigue on subjective well-being through emotional distress and the buffering effect of self-compassion.

METHODS: Data were collected from 1,162 university students (M (age) = 21.61 ± 2.81, female 35.71%) through an online survey. Indirect effect analysis and conditional process analysis were conducted by the SPSS macro PROCESS.

RESULTS: Indirect effect of pandemic fatigue on subjective well-being through emotional distress was identified and self-compassion moderated the association between pandemic fatigue and emotional distress. The indirect effect of pandemic fatigue was weaker among participants with high levels of self-compassion than among those with low levels of self-compassion.

CONCLUSION: Pandemic fatigue was negatively associated with subjective well-being through emotional distress at all levels of self-compassion. The findings deepen our understanding of the link between pandemic fatigue and well-being while considering the indirect role of emotional distress and protective function of self-compassion.

Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Female; Male; Young Adult; *Psychological Distress; *COVID-19/epidemiology; Pandemics; self-compassion; emotional distress; *Mental Fatigue; conditional process; pandemic fatigue; Self-Compassion; subjective well-being