SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yu F, Fan B, Qin C, Yao C. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2023; 24(4): e04023040.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, American Society of Civil Engineers)

DOI

10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1722

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

To reduce disaster response failures, controlling disaster preparedness faults is essential. Emergency management departments should analyze the lack of capability as soon as an early warning is released and make adaptive improvements based on disaster risk information. However, because of time constraints and experience scarcity, it frequently is challenging for decision makers to identify faults precisely and develop suitable fault-control measures. Current studies lack attention to this aspect. Case-based reasoning (CBR) can rapidly acquire relevant knowledge for target case by learning from historical cases. Therefore, this paper adopts CBR to support fault-control decision-making when a disaster is approaching. We introduce the cause–effect bow-tie diagram to reconstruct an ontology-supported fault-control scenario model. Based on the structured scenario, a multiphase scenario retrieval is presented to recommend similar scenarios. To generate the target fault-control measures, a hybrid scenario reuse is carried out to adjust the previous fault-control measures in similar scenarios. Finally, a case study illustrates the proposed model’s use in a typhoon situation. The results show that scenario-driven CBR is a proactive and agile approach for providing fault-control suggestions.


Language: en

Keywords

Case-based reasoning (CBR); Disaster preparedness; Fault-control decision; Ontology; Scenario

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print