Citation

Dahlberg J, Phares BM, Liu Z, Freeseman KS. Transp. Res. Rec. 2023; 2677(8): 78-99.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/03611981231155431

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Lateral slide-in bridge construction--also referred to as slide-in bridge construction (SIBC)--has gained increasing attention as a viable accelerated bridge construction (ABC) approach. Although SIBC has been successfully employed on multiple single-span bridge projects, the use of SIBC on multi-span bridges is rare. Adding more spans creates a more complex system that requires connections (and other details) that were previously not needed in a single-span slide. Also, it is a concern that the multi-span bridge would need to slide on piers, which creates possible uplift and overturning scenarios. As such, it was vitally important to understand the structural response of the substructure during the bridge sliding. Although much general information on lateral slides as an ABC method was available, very little literature had been published related explicitly to such construction for multi-span bridges. The objective of this research was to develop durable design details to be used with the lateral slide concept with a focus on pier connection details and evaluate the performance of the bridge pier during the sliding. To achieve the goal, relevant information was collected and evaluated by conducting a literature review on various details and construction approaches for previously completed lateral slide projects. Further, a three-span, 300 ft long steel girder bridge on IA 1 southwest of Iowa City, Iowa, U.S., was monitored using gauges during the slide-in. The results indicated that the current slide-in practice works well with the multi-span steel girder superstructure and the wall pier. No significant response from the substructure was visually observed during the slide-in, and no cracking occurred on the concrete deck or piers. This indicated that the superstructure with steel girders and concrete diaphragms could be built with the lateral slide-in method. The significant strain was measured from the pile strain gauges. However, the piles were functionally adequate to carry the vertical load, and the moment carried by each pile was minimal. An uplifting action was captured on Pier 1. However, this effect was minimal on Pier 2.

Language: en