Citation

Finch BK, Thomas K, Beck AN, Burghart DB, Klinger D, Johnson RR. J. Quant. Criminol. 2022; 38(1): 267-293.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10940-021-09493-x

PMID

37860123

PMCID

PMC10586131

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The most widely used data set for studying police homicides-the Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) kept by the Federal Bureau of Investigation-is collected from a voluntary sample.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a journalist-curated database of police-related deaths, we find the SHR police homicide data to be substantially incomplete. This is due to both non-reporting and substantial under-reporting by agencies. Further, our inquiry discloses a pattern of error in identifying "victims" and "offenders" in the data, and finds that investigating agencies are often incorrectly listed as the responsible agency, which seriously jeopardizes police department-level analyses. Finally, there is evidence of sample bias such that the SHR data system is not representative of all police departments, nor is it representative of large police departments.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the SHR data is of dubious value for assessing correlates of police homicides in the United States, as all analyses using it will reflect these widespread biases and significant undercounts. Analysis of SHR data for these purposes should cease.

Language: en

Keywords

Officer-involved homicide; Police homicide; Supplementary Homicide Reports; Uniform Crime Reports