Citation

Gonzalez SM, Simon SJ, Rogers KK. Law Soc. Rev. 2022; 56(3): 477-499.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Law and Society Association, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/lasr.12623

PMID

37936682

PMCID

PMC10629869

Abstract

Diversifying police forces has been suggested to improve "police-minority relations" amidst national uprisings against police violence. Yet, little research investigates how police and black civilians-two groups invoked in discourse on "police-minority relations"-understand the function of diversity interventions. We draw on 100 in-depth interviews with 60 black women civilians and 40 police from various racial and ethnic backgrounds to explore how they understand the function of racial diversity in policing.

FINDINGS highlight discrepancies in how these two groups frame the utility of racial diversity in policing, revealing conflicting epistemologies of race and racism. Police draw on an epistemology of racial ignorance (Mills 1997, 2007, 2015) to selectively accommodate race-conscious critique while denying the history and power dynamics between the institution and minority communities. Conversely, black women civilians, grounded in a standpoint epistemology (Collins 1986, 2009), emphasize the historical roots of policing, along with collective memories and lived experiences to understand the relationship between the institution and minority communities. Through a comparative analysis of these frames, we theorize dominant/state-sponsored discourse on diversity and police-minority relations as form of racecraft (Fields and Fields 2012, 2014) that serves to legitimize negligible institutional change to policing in an era of renewed scrutiny of police racism.

Language: en

Keywords

Police; diversity; black women; epistemology of racial ignorance; standpoint epistemology