Citation

Cunnington C, Clark T. Qual. Soc. Work 2023; 22(6): 1157-1174.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/14733250221124300

PMID

37969948

PMCID

PMC10638087

Abstract

There is a well-established literature examining how perpetrators of child sexual abuse (CSA) neutralise the norms and beliefs that ordinarily prohibit such behaviours. However, there has been substantially less focus on how such techniques of neutralisation might also be applied by people and groups who were not directly involved in the abuse, who we might expect to be more supportive. Drawing on a thematic analysis of an open-ended survey (n=140) and semi-structured interviews (n=21) with adults who experienced childhood sexual abuse this paper examines societal responses to disclosure. Identifying three key techniques of neutralisation, it explores how families, professionals and institutions use wider discourses that deny the victim/survivor, deny or minimise harm and silence by appealing to loyalty. The results demonstrate how significant others can constrain, rather than support, the process of disclosure and recovering from CSA.

Language: en

Keywords

children; mental health; trauma; recovery; sexual abuse; adults; disclosure; user research