SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Diaz-Piedra C, Liedo B, de Prado-Gordillo MN, Caurcel MJ, Stasi LLD. Transp. Res. Proc. 2023; 72: 2449-2456.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Elsevier Publications)

DOI

10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.745

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Much research on the ethics of automated driving (AD) focusses on moral decision-making processes in extreme traffic situations. However, more likely scenarios involving daily trade-offs among different values in the design and implementation of AD are also worth considering. Our main goal was to provide an in-depth analysis of how diverse experts and stakeholders prioritize different socio-political values. Through a series of workshops, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups, we assessed today's major social, ethical, and legal concerns related to AD, as well as their relative prioritization in specific near-future realistic traffic scenarios. We summarize experts' and lay-people's opinions on the trade-offs among six socio-political values (privacy, autonomy, safety, security, performance, and costs) and present overall recommendations for the design of future AD technologies.


Language: en

Keywords

Algorithmic Ethics; Automated driving; Ethical and political values; Human-Machine Integration; Traffic psychology

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print