CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Gross ML. Am. J. Bioeth. 2024; ePub(ePub): ePub. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2024, MIT Press) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
38376507 |
|
Abstract |
Since 2022, the EU, US, and other nations have imposed medical sanctions on Russia to block the export of pharmaceuticals and medical devices and curtail clinical trials to degrade Russia's military capabilities. While international law proscribes sanctions that cause a humanitarian crisis, an outcome averted in Russia, the military effects of medical sanctions have been lean. Strengthening medical sanctions risks violating noncombatant and combatant rights to healthcare. Each group's claim is different. Noncombatants and severely injured soldiers who cannot return to duty enjoy the right to adequate health care that sanctions cannot undermine. Combatants falling captive enjoy the same medical care that adversaries provide their own troops. Combatants yet to renounce hostilities, however, have no claim to medical attention and remain subject to sanctions. Nevertheless, medical sanctions prove unworkable in this complex environment of conflicting rights and command no place in a sustainable sanction regime. Language: en |
|
Keywords |
Sanctions; military ethics; law of armed conflict; healthcare rights; noncombatant immunity; conflict medicine; Russia–Ukraine war |