SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Grimell J, Nilsson S. Mil. Psychol. 2020; 32(6): 380-388.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/08995605.2020.1794478

PMID

38536263

PMCID

PMC10013254

Abstract

Both the models of moral distress and of moral injury place an emphasis on various types of moral challenges that may violate the individual's conscience, evoking moral emotions. Yet, there appears to be great conceptual confusion as regards both scholarly perspectives. The purpose of this article is to further elaborate on the qualitative content and conceptual demarcations of the theories of moral injury and moral distress. In the light of this theoretical elaboration, we propose an integrated moral distress and injury scale that provides a more holistic overview of these moral challenges. We suggest that the utility and applicability of the moral injury and moral distress theories may benefit from the integration of these concepts. A practical implication of our theoretical understanding is that processes of recovery, which involve moral dimensions, are complex. In line with this understanding, we advocate a holistic approach to health and well-being among military service members and Veterans.


Language: en

Keywords

health; military; Moral challenges; moral distress; moral injury

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print