Citation

Lazenbatt A, Taylor J, Cree L. Midwifery 2009; 25(6): 622-636.

Affiliation

School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Institute of Child Care Research, 6 College Park, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.midw.2007.11.001

PMID

18314234

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: to compare and contrast how midwives working in either hospital- or community-based settings address domestic violence by evaluating their views on: prevalence of domestic violence; their role in addressing domestic violence; the acceptability of routine enquiry; and barriers encountered in asking clients questions about violence and abuse in pregnancy. DESIGN: a postal survey questionnaire. SETTING: Northern Ireland. STUDY POPULATION: 983 hospital and community midwives. FINDINGS: overall, 488 midwives returned a completed questionnaire; a 57% response rate. Comparisons were made using descriptive, inferential statistics and cross-tabulation. Although there were significant differences between hospital- and community-based midwives in relation to domestic violence, both groups of midwives tended to underestimate its prevalence. KEY CONCLUSIONS: the findings suggest that midwives per se identify and respond to a fraction of the cases of domestic abuse in pregnancy, due to lack of confidence, education and training. This reinforces the need for both hospital and community midwives to gain further confidence and an understanding of the many psychosocial factors that surround domestic violence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: healthy settings theory can be used effectively to identify good practice with women who experience domestic violence. Effective investment for health care requires the gaps between hospital- and community-based practice to be bridged, and for work to be integrated.

Language: en