SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Merchant RC, Phillips BZ, Delong AK, Mayer KH, Becker BM. J. Womens Health (Larchmont) 2008; 17(4): 619-629.

Affiliation

Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island., Department of Community Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Mary Ann Liebert Publishers)

DOI

10.1089/jwh.2007.0472

PMID

18346000

PMCID

PMC3180868

Abstract

Objectives: To determine how often sexually assaulted adult female emergency department (ED) patients are being offered testing and prophylaxis for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and pregnancy and identify factors associated with the offering of tests and prophylaxis. Methods: This is a retrospective study of ED visits for adult female sexual assault in all Rhode Island EDs from January 1995 through June 2001. The percentage of patients offered testing and prophylaxis was calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors related to testing and prophylaxis use for women sustaining an anal/vaginal assault. Results: Of the 780 patients, 78.2% sustained anal/vaginal penetration, 5.0% genital touching only, and 3.7% oral sex only, and 13.1% did not know what happened to them. Of those women anal/vaginally assaulted, 83.8% were offered chlamydia/gonorrhea testing, 69.4% syphilis testing, 82.9% pregnancy testing, 77.0% chlamydia/gonorrhea prophylaxis, 47.6% emergency contraception, and 19.2% HIV prophylaxis. In multivariable logistic regression models, patients evaluated at the state's women's hospital instead of academic or community hospitals and those who sustained anal/vaginal assault instead of other assaults had a greater odds of being offered testing and prophylaxis. In some cases, older women were offered testing and prophylaxis less often than younger women. Conclusions: Testing and prophylaxis for chlamydia/gonorrhea were used much more often than prophylaxis for emergency contraception and HIV, even for patients who were anal/vaginally assaulted. Disparities in testing and prophylaxis exist by type of hospital and, in some cases, by age. Educational campaigns should be instituted to ensure that all women receive adequate testing and prophylaxis commensurate with the exposure they sustained from a sexual assault.

Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print