SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Elahi MM, Brar MS, Ahmed N, Howley DB, Nishtar S, Mahoney JL. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008; 121(1): 201-208.

Affiliation

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. mmelahi93@hotmail.com

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/01.prs.0000293763.82790.aa

PMID

18176222

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical spine injuries associated with facial fractures varies from study to study. There is general agreement that immediate management of cervical spine injuries is mandatory to prevent further neurologic injury. Nevertheless, disagreement exists as to the actual incidence of cervical spinal trauma in conjunction with various facial fracture patterns. The purpose of this study was to review the incidence of cervical spine injury associated with various types of facial fractures presenting to St. Michael's Hospital Regional Trauma Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of craniomaxillofacial fracture patients presenting to St. Michael's Hospital from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2003, inclusive. RESULTS: The data from this 10-year time span revealed a total of 124 patients with cervical spine injuries drawn from a cohort of 3356 patients with craniomaxillofacial fractures. The overall incidence of cervical spine injury was 3.69 percent. Of these patients, 928 had isolated upper third facial or skull fractures, whereas isolated middle third facial fractures were seen in 716 patients and isolated lower third facial fractures were present in 798 patients. Combined facial fracture patterns, involving two or more facial thirds, accounted for the greatest number of cervical spine injuries, occurring in 8.86 percent (n = 914). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between cervical spinal injuries and craniomaxillofacial trauma has been better defined as it relates to a regional trauma registry. The implications as related to the trauma assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of these injuries are reviewed.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print