Citation

Donovan RJ, Jalleh G, Fielder L, Ouschan R. J. Public Aff. 2009; 9(1): 5-19.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/pa.308

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The Australian White Ribbon Day 2006 campaign was severely criticized by mental health professionals and those working in the family and domestic violence sector because of depictions of suicide and self-harm in the television advertisement and accompanying promotional materials. The White Ribbon Day (WRD) National Leadership Group (NLG) rejected all requests by concerned groups to not use these campaign materials. They and their apologists claimed that such violent imagery was necessary to attract men's attention and was being misinterpreted as depicting suicide attempts.With preliminary ethics approval we set out to assess reactions to the television advertisement. After 24 interviews, the testing was terminated by the university research ethics officer after two male respondents demonstrated significant distress after viewing the ad. Furthermore, the results by that stage showed that there were perceived messages of suicide in the ad. These results were sent to the WRD NLG with a request to reconsider proceeding with the television advertisement and associated materials. Mental health and domestic violence organizations lodged similar requests. All requests were rejected. The case raises a number of ethical issues for pro-social organizations when dealing with sensitive issues and using execution techniques that may impact negatively on vulnerable audiences. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.