Citation

Stork CM, Rees S, Howland MA, Kaplan L, Goldfrank L, Hoffman RS. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 1996; 34(2): 157-162.

Affiliation

New York City Poison Control Center, Bellevue Hospital Center New York, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, Marcel Dekker)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8618248

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this trial was to compare the pharmacokinetics of the two available acetaminophen dosage forms in simulated human overdose. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers received acetaminophen, 75 mg/kg orally, either as the regular release or extended relief formulation in a random, crossover fashion. Blood samples were analyzed using a TDx assay and a best fit correlation of data points was determined by PCNONLIN. RESULTS: The area under the curves for extended relief acetaminophen and regular release acetaminophen were 426 mg h/L and 432 mg h/L, respectively (p = 0.768). The mean half times for extended relief acetaminophen and regular release acetaminophen were 4.02 h and 2.56 h, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean maximum serum acetaminophen concentrations were 62.6 mg/L (414.4 mmol/L:) and 94.3 mg/L (624.3 mmol/L) for extended relief acetaminophen and regular release acetaminophen, respectively (p < 0.001) and the mean time to maximum serum acetaminophen concentrations were 0.87 h and 0.75 h for extended relief acetaminophen and regular release acetaminophen, respectively (p = 0.508). CONCLUSIONS: Although the formulations appear to have equal bioavailability, their half-lives and peak concentrations were significantly different. Further study is required to determine whether these differences affect the assessment and management of poisoned patients.

Language: en