Citation

Crick NR, Bigbee MA. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1998; 66(2): 337-347.

Affiliation

Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1998, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9583337

Abstract

This research addressed 2 limitations of past research on peer victimization: the tendency to study boys only and the tendency to focus on forms of peer maltreatment that are common in boys' peer groups (victimization through overt aggression) but occur much less frequently in girls' peer groups. Peer- and self-report instruments were used to assess a relational form of victimization in addition to the overt form that has been the focus of past research. Results showed that girls were more relationally victimized, whereas boys were more overtly victimized. Both forms of victimization were shown to predict concurrent sociopsychological adjustment problems significantly (e.g., peer rejection, loneliness) beyond aggression. Victims identified through a combination of self- and peer-reports were particularly maladjusted.

Language: en