Citation

Plugge E, Fletcher L, Stewart-Brown S. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2001; 55(11): 789-790.

Affiliation

Health Services Research Unit, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, UK. emma.plugge@epublichealth.org.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11604433

PMCID

PMC1763310

Abstract

The health benefits of moderate consumption and the damaging consequences of excessive consumption of alcohol are well documented. Injury is an important alcohol related health problem but while the role of alcohol in particular types of injury has been studied, there is little information on particular types of alcoholic beverage and injuries. This contrasts with the literature on cardiovascular disease and alcohol where the relation with the consumption of different beverages has been extensively explored. The evidence here indicates that there is no specific benefit associated with one type of beverage; the extra benefit associated with wine in some studies can be explained by different drinking patterns.

We looked at data from a community survey to explore for the first time, the relation between the risk of non-fatal injury and the consumption of particular types of beverage.

Sixteen per cent of all respondents reported an injury requiring medical attention in the previous 12 months. Those who drank any alcohol were significantly more likely to report being injured than those who abstained (16.4% versus 12.5%, chi sq=11.26, p=0.0008). Those who drank wine were less likely to have been injured than those drinking other beverages (15.3% versus 18.1%, chi sq=10.53, p=0.001), and those who drank beer or alcopops were more likely to report being injured (18.9% versus 12.8%, chi sq =49.8, p=0.00000 and 21.9% versus 16.1%, chi sq=10.58, p=0.001). No differences were seen for sherry and spirit drinkers.

Logistic regression revealed that when age, sex and amount of alcohol had been controlled for, there were only significant differences in the risk of injury for drinkers of beer or alcopops, although the added risk was small (odds ratios 1.17 (95% confidence intervals 1.01 to 1.36) and 1.30 (1.02 to 1.66) respectively).

While confirming the association between alcohol use and accidental injury shown in many other studies, this study is the first to look specifically at the relation between different beverages and all types of non-fatal injury that have required medical attention. Our findings indicate that there is a relation between the type of beverage drunk and the likelihood of injury but that this probably is not because of any intrinsic quality of the beverage. Rather it can largely be explained by sex and age differences between groups of drinkers, and the amount of alcohol consumed. It would be interesting to examine whether the pattern of drinking affected the risk of injury and accounted for the slight increase in beer and alcopop drinkers, but no such data were available from the survey. People are more likely to be injured when acutely intoxicated and beer and alcopop drinkers may be more inclined to "binge" drink.

We acknowledge that there are certain limitations to our study because the data on alcohol consumption relate to a time period which is after the occurrence of the injury. However, as the great majority of injuries requiring medical attention had no lasting consequences, it is unlikely that alcohol consumption is affected by the experience of injury.

Studies examining the behavioural effects of different beverages show that differences between beer, wine and spirit drinkers in alcohol related problems such as drink driving, can be attributed to the differences in the age and sex of the drinker and how much and how often they drink. The results of our study, while looking at a different outcome, concur with these findings and reinforce the need to reduce alcohol consumption as part of any injury prevention strategy.

Language: en