SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Haikonen S, Wikman AS, Kalska H, Summala H, Hietanen M, Nieminen T, Vilkki J. Appl. Neuropsychol. 1998; 5(1): 24-32.

Affiliation

Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1998, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1207/s15324826an0501_3

PMID

16318463

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find out the neuropsychological measures correlating with overlong glances at secondary in-car tasks while driving. Fifteen. patients with brain damage (without clear neurological or neuropsychological restriction on driving a car) and 11 healthy participants drove a route of 126 km and performed a series of secondary tasks while driving on a highway in an instrumented compact car. Four videocameras allowed detailed analysis of glances during in-car tasks. Neuropsychological measures focused on executive functions, memory, visuospatial skills, and fine motor skills. Moreover, patients' emotional self-evaluation and relatives' evaluation of patients' competencies were included. The proportion of overlong glances away from the road during in-car tasks was greater among the patients than. the healthy drivers. The long glances of the patients correlated strongly with motor and visuospatial deficits, cognitive inflexibility, emotional symptoms, and relatives' evaluations of patients' impaired sensomotor abilities. The results suggest that the frequency of overlong glances was increased by 2 factors: (a) impaired motor and visuospatial skills that evidently caused difficulties in the manipulation of the equipment of the secondary tasks, and (b) impairments of executive functions that were likely to decrease the ability to control the risks related to long glances at the in-car tasks. The slowing of speed during secondary tasks was on the average rather slight and not significantly more pronounced among patients than control drivers, indicating that patients failed to reduce their speed and thus the risk related to prolonged glances at in-car tasks.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print