SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Booth BM, Curran GM, Han X. J. Stud. Alcohol 2004; 65(1): 63-73.

Affiliation

Centers for Mental Healthcare Research, Department of Psychiatry, University ofArkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA. BoothBrendaM@uams.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15000505

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of changes in drinking and drinking consequences in untreated at-risk drinkers in a community sample. METHOD: Four waves of telephone interviews were conducted at 6-month intervals with a probability sample of at-risk drinkers in the rural and urban South (initial N = 733). Participants were interviewed at each wave regarding concurrent drug use, psychopathology and social support, as well as alcohol service use. Individuals reporting receiving services for drinking (n = 69) were dropped from the analyses. Longitudinal data were analyzed for predictors of quantity and frequency of drinking, "safe" drinking levels and diagnoses of recent alcohol disorder. Simultaneous and lagged models were fit for each dependent variable. RESULTS: Over the period of study, drinking quantity and alcohol diagnoses decreased, and safe drinking increased. Only a few variables, including drug use and rural residence, predicted change over time for some outcomes. Remaining significant effects associated with drinking outcomes were constant throughout the study. Women and participants scoring high on religiosity experienced better outcomes; illegal drug use and social consequences of drinking were associated with worse outcomes. Rural residents maintained higher drinking quantity and were less likely to be safe drinkers than urban residents were. Psychiatric comorbidity was significantly associated only with drinking quantity. CONCLUSIONS: These data distinguish which at-risk drinkers might benefit from short or delayed interventions in primary care or community settings, and which should receive more intensive, targeted interventions and be encouraged to enter formal treatment as soon as possible.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print