Citation

McVay JC, Kane MJ, Kwapil TR. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2009; 16(5): 857-863.

Affiliation

Psychology Department, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina 27402-6170, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Psychonomic Society Publications)

DOI

10.3758/PBR.16.5.857

PMID

19815789

PMCID

PMC2760023

Abstract

In an experience-sampling study that bridged laboratory, ecological, and individual-differences approaches to mind-wandering research, 72 subjects completed an executive-control task with periodic thought probes (reported by McVay & Kane, 2009) and then carried PDAs for a week that signaled them eight times daily to report immediately whether their thoughts were off task. Subjects who reported more mind wandering during the laboratory task endorsed more mind-wandering experiences during everyday life (and were more likely to report worries as off-task thought content). We also conceptually replicated laboratory findings that mind wandering predicts task performance: Subjects rated their daily-life performance to be impaired when they reported off-task thoughts, with greatest impairment when subjects' mind wandering lacked metaconsciousness. The propensity to mind wander appears to be a stable cognitive characteristic and seems to predict performance difficulties in daily life, just as it does in the laboratory.

Language: en