SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Foreman-Mackey A, Bayoumi AM, Miskovic M, Kolla G, Strike C. Int. J. Drug Policy 2019; 73: 135-140.

Affiliation

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, M5T 3M7 Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: carol.strike@utoronto.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.019

PMID

31654936

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overdose prevention sites (OPSs) are spaces where people can consume drugs under the supervision of trained volunteers or staff and receive help in the event of an overdose. Unsanctioned OPSs are a grassroots response to the current opioid crisis in Canada.

METHODS: We used rapid evaluation methods to study the experiences of 30 individuals accessing the smoking and injection services at the first unsanctioned OPS in Toronto, Ontario using semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using an applied thematic analysis approach to identify emergent themes related to service user experiences, characteristics of the risk environment, and recommended changes to the service model.

RESULTS: The OPS represented a safe sanctuary and brought a sense of belonging to a community that often experiences discrimination. Valued aspects included: shelter; protection from violence; safety from overdoses; free equipment; information about health and social services; food and beverages; and socializing and connecting with others. Integrating peer workers in the design and delivery of services encouraged service users to visit the site. The OPS changed the risk environment by: providing access to the first supervised smoking service in Toronto; having few explicit rules and a communal approach to making new rules; allowing assisted injection, and negotiating with police to allow people to access the site with minimal contact. Service users noted the need to ensure a safe space for women and recommended extended hours of operation and moving to a more permanent space with heat and lighting for both smoking and injecting drugs.

CONCLUSION: The unsanctioned OPS in Toronto served an important role in defining new, community-led, flexible responses to opioid overdose-related deaths at a time of markedly increasing mortality. Providing harm reduction services in diverse settings and expanding services to include smoking and assisted injection may increase access for marginalized people who use drugs.

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Assisted injection; Community activism; Harm reduction; Overdose prevention; Qualitative research; Supervised consumption; Supervised smoking

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print