SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Fournet C. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2019; 69: e101852.

Affiliation

University of Groningen, Faculty of Law, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Netherlands. Electronic address: c.i.fournet@rug.nl.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jflm.2019.07.008

PMID

31733462

Abstract

In the light of the recent judgments issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), including two acquittals and one very recent condemnation of the accused on all charges, analysing and assessing evidentiary practice before the Court is all the more pressing. This article focuses on one particular type of evidence used by the Prosecution, namely, forensic evidence, to critically review how it has been used so far at the ICC and consider whether the prosecutorial strategy of focusing on a certain sample of crimes is finally paying off.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Atrocity trials; Expert witnesses; Forensic evidence; International Criminal Court

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print