Citation

Moskos MA, Achilles J, Gray D. Crisis 2004; 25(4): 176-182.

Affiliation

Univ. of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Intermountain Injury Control Research Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. michelle.moskos@hsc.utah.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, International Association for Suicide Prevention, Publisher Hogrefe Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15580853

Abstract

In the United States, teen suicide rates tripled over several decades, but have declined slightly since the mid-1990s. Suicide, by its nature, is a complex problem. Many myths have developed about individuals who complete suicide, suicide risk factors, current prevention programs, and the treatment of at-risk youth. The purpose of this article is to address these myths, to separate fact from fiction, and offer recommendations for future suicide prevention programs. Myth #1: Suicide attempters and completers are similar Myth #2: Current prevention programs work. Myth #3: Teenagers have the highest suicide rate. Myth #4: Suicide is caused by family and social stress. Myth #5: Suicide is not inherited genetically. Myth #6: Teen suicide represents treatment failure. Psychiatric illnesses are often viewed differently from other medical problems. Research should precede any public health effort, so that suicide prevention programs can be designed, implemented, and evaluated appropriately. Too often suicide prevention programs do not use evidence-based research or practice methodologies. More funding is warranted to continue evidence-based studies. We propose that suicide be studied like any medical illness, and that future prevention efforts are evidence-based, with appropriate outcome measures.