SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Blaschke C, Breyer F, Färber B, Freyer J, Limbacher R. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2009; 12(4): 288-299.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2009.02.002

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Driver assistance systems could be much more effective, if they were adaptive to the driver’s state. Following the idea of a lane-keeping assistance system, which is adaptive to the use of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS), two field experiments were conducted. The first experiment concerned the influence of typical IVIS tasks on lane-keeping. Most IVIS tasks increased the lateral deviations, but in the majority of cases the drivers were still able to stay in their lane.

The second experiment concerned two questions: (1) how much lateral support would be needed and (2) how drivers accept this kind of support. The results show that all lateral support algorithms increased the lane-keeping performance with the algorithms providing a higher amount of assistance proving the most useful. All assistance systems were rated as helpful and were considered to increase driver safety, both by the drivers who did not have problems in lane-keeping without assistance.

In light of these results an adaptation of a lateral support system to the IVIS-use seems to be useful and worthwhile.

Keywords: Driver distraction;

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print