SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Young KL, Regan MA, Mitsopoulos E. Road Transp. Res. 2004; 13(2): 6-16.

Affiliation

Monash University, Accident Research Centre

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Australian Road Research Board)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A number of in-vehicle intelligent transport system (ITS) technologies with the potential to significantly reduce the incidence and severity of young novice driver crashes are currently available or exist in advanced prototype form.  These systems will have little impact on young driver safety, however, unless they are deemed acceptable by young drivers.  This study assessed the acceptability of several in-vehicle ITS technologies to a sample of Australian young novice drivers.  Eight focus groups were conducted: four in metropolitan (Sydney) and four in rural (Wagga Wagga) New South Wales.  The groups involved 58 drivers aged 17-25 years who, from examination of crash data, were likely to derive the greatest safety benefit from the selected technologies.  Results revealed that the alcohol interlock and seat belt reminder systems were the most acceptable to young drivers, while the fatigue warning (for rural participants only), intelligent speed adaptation and lane departure warning had the lowest levels of perceived acceptability.  The attitudes of metropolitan and rural participants towards the systems were generally very similar; however, a number of differences in the acceptability of several technologies were observed.  Suggestions for enhancing the acceptability of ITS technologies to young novice drivers are offered, along with recommendations for further research.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print