Citation

Winstok Z. J. Aggression Maltreat. Trauma 2005; 13(2): 37-47.

Affiliation

Minerva Center for Youth Studies , University of Haifa, Israel

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1300/J146v13n02_03

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study describes and analyzes the dimensions of the escalation process and tests the feasibility of the suggested unit of analysis. To this end, the structure of escalation prescription and its intensity are explored as representing attitudinal guidelines concerning desirable ways to react to various provocations. Participants consisted of 799 Jewish students from 11 junior-high schools who were involved in at least one conflict during the four weeks prior to the study. A new instrument to measure escalation prescription was devised. Multidimensional scaling was used to explore the construct. As expected, three constraints determined the configuration of the variables: (a) the distinction between the types of provocations; (b) the distinction between the types of reactions to these provocations; and (c) the distinction between proportional and disproportional reactions. Underlying these constraints were the discrepancies between provocation and reaction that delineate the concept of escalation.