Citation

Korner-Bitensky N, Menon A, von Zweck C, Van Benthem K. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2010; 64(2): 316-324.

Affiliation

Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3630 Promenades Sir-William-Osler, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y5, Canada. nicol.korner-bitensky@mcgill.ca

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, American Occupational Therapy Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

20437919

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older driver safety is a growing concern. We identified capacity-building needs of occupational therapists related to older driver screening, assessment, and intervention. METHOD: A Canadawide survey was undertaken involving 133 occupational therapists working with an older clientele. A standardized questionnaire elicited information regarding (1) actual practices related to older driver screening, assessment, and intervention; (2) perceived competence; and (3) need for continuing education. RESULTS: Occupational therapists were twice as likely to use screening tools rather than in-depth assessments (n = 79 vs. n = 37). Only 25 occupational therapists offered on-road assessment, and even fewer offered retraining (n = 11). Occupational therapists more often felt very competent in domains related to screening as opposed to assessment, and most were interested in continuing education. CONCLUSION: Driving services offered were primarily related to screening compared with assessment or intervention. Occupational therapists would benefit from driving-related professional training aimed at enhancing professional capacity in this arena.

Language: en