SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Carnahan H, McFadyen BJ. Acta Psychol. 1996; 92(1): 17-32.

Affiliation

Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. carnahan@healthy.uwaterloo.ca

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8693952

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine the influence of target motion on the control and coordination of reaching and grasping movements. In Experiment 1 all the measures which reflected the transport or reaching phase of prehension (movement time, peak velocity, time to peak velocity, and transport tau margin) were sensitive to the velocity of the target, with subjects moving even slower than during the stationary trials, when the target was moving very slowly. Measures which reflected grasp formation such as the size of maximum aperture and the grasping tau margin were not influenced by target speed. To further investigate this dissociation between grasp and transport, different object sizes and even slower object speeds were introduced in Experiment 2. Transport results similar to those found in the first study were observed. However, in Experiment 2, both size of peak aperture and the grasping tau margin were sensitive to target movement. The results of these two studies are discussed in terms of the limitations of optic variables in the visual regulation of movement, and the independence of control of the reach and grasp phase of prehension.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print