SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Braver ER, Preusser CW, Ulmer RG. J. Saf. Res. 1999; 30(3): 193-204.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, U.S. National Safety Council, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Tight delivery schedules have been blamed for widespread violations of hours-of-service rules by interstate tractor-trailer drivers. The purpose of the present study was to identify determinants of drivers' schedules, particularly delivery requirements of shippers. Long-haul drivers were surveyed at weigh stations in Wyoming and Tennessee and asked who had arranged their current loads. The arranger, usually a motor-carrier dispatcher, then was interviewed by telephone. Interviews were conducted with 270 of 309 identified dispatchers. Revenue was the most frequently cited factor (75%) in decisions to accept or reject loads from shippers. Delivery deadlines (24%) and the hours-of-service status of the nearest driver (9%) were cited much less. Dispatchers reported that shippers ask for sufficient time for drivers to adhere to both speed limits and hours-of-service rules. Trip mileage is reported as the key determinant of trip schedule assignments (58%); however, other factors also are considered, including speed limits (27%) and past experience with particular routes (13%). About two-thirds of the dispatchers reported using rule-of-thumb average travel speeds. Overall, 14% of dispatchers reported that they expected drivers to travel at an average speed in excess of 60 mph. Tight delivery schedules and hours-of-service violations can occur if rule-of-thumb average speeds above 60 mph are the primary basis for assigned trip times. This survey suggests that tight schedules cannot be attributed solely to shipper demands.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print