Citation

Isenberg GL, Matthews WJ. Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 1995; 38(1): 27-38.

Affiliation

University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, American Society of Clinical Hypnosis)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8533737

Abstract

Historically hypnosis with deaf people has been an underutilized intervention as the deaf were assumed not to be responsive to hypnotic suggestion. Recent research has begun to challenge these assumptions. Matthews and Isenberg (in press) compared the hypnotic responsiveness of deaf and hearing subjects on the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, form C (SHSS:C) all of whom received the hypnotic suggestions via sign language. Those results supported the notion that deaf subjects are capable of responding to hypnotic suggestion and may be as hypnotically responsive as hearing subjects. The purpose of the present article is to examine the similarities and differences of responses between deaf and hearing subjects to the individual items of the SHSS:C and compare those responses to the SHSS:C norms.

Language: en