SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jaquier V, Fisher BS, Killias M. J. Contemp. Crim. Justice 2006; 22(2): 90-112.

Affiliation

University of Lausanne, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Switzerland; University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1043986206286969

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Valid and reliable cross-national estimates of rape are needed to more fully understand the extent and nature of these victimizations. Methodological issues that compromise the integrity of cross-national comparisons of self-report survey data have been identified. These issues have neither been systematically addressed, nor is there a consensus as to how to correct them. This article examines the effects that the definition and operationalization of rape have on completed and attempted rape estimates from the National Violence Against Women Survey in the United States and the Swiss component of the International Violence Against Women Survey. Survey design issues related to operationalizing the victim-offender relationship and its effect on rape estimates are discussed. Cross-national rape estimates with and without addressing the comparability issues are presented. The implications for engaging in comparative rape research are also discussed.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print